Speer, an “arch manipulator” as Van der Vat puts it, differentiated himself from the other Nazi leaders by following an unprecedented line of argument in claiming collective responsibility. In doing so, he accepted full responsibility for carrying out Hitler’s orders, albeit Speer disobeyed him in mentioning that he attempted to save the German infrastructure from Hitler’s ‘scorched earth’ policy. Therefore, allowing Speer to sculpt his image in which he worked for the interests of the German people and consequently repudiated the anti-Semitism and destructive views of Hitler, sustaining how his maneuvers enabled him to influence his own circumstances. By mentioning such events to his advantage, he sets forth himself to the world as a sympathetic and apologetic Nazi. Furthermore, although he acknowledged his guilt for the forced labour programs, he denied any knowledge of mass extermination of the Jewish people. From this, he was sentenced to 20 years in Spandau prison where his confession and remorse characterised him as ’the penitent Nazi’. Hence, by using such events, Speer attempted to paint the ‘good Nazi’ in comparison to his alleged image of a liar and hypocrite. Thus, Speer was the epitome of using events to his advantage to subsequently shape his prominent role in Nazi