2.Many Americans were worried by the notion that any American can become president because the previous presidents were experienced and educated politicians and an ordinary person that became president would ruin the government. The Founding Fathers feared majority rule and knew the republic could not sustain itself based on the majority. As a result, they created the electoral college to insulate against the will of …show more content…
William Graham Sumner emphasized Jackson’s flawed moral character and emotional excesses. Sumner, Herman von Holst, and James Schouler are classified as “liberal patricians”, or individuals who came from a high background, received an education, and were biased against Jackson. Frederick Jackson Turner, Charles A. Beard, Vernon L. Parrington, and other western and southern historians, dubbed as Progressives, applauded Jackson as a man of the people. Tocqueville’s democratic liberalism suggested Jacksonian Democracy was based on the role of geographic sections. Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr. argued against this belief and faced both praise and condemnation. Richard Hofstadter’s entrepreneurial thesis stated that the Jeffersonians were ambitious and ruthless. Andrew Jackson was aggressive, dynamic, charismatic, and intimidating individual which creates varying thoughts on his character. These interpretations tell you the beliefs and mood of the period that shaped those