Marshall's jurisprudence played a significant role in strengthening the power of the federal government. He believed in a broad interpretation of the Constitution, which allowed the federal government to exercise more authority. Marshall's decisions, such as in the case of McCulloch v. Maryland, expanded the federal government's powers by affirming its ability to create a national bank and asserting the supremacy of federal law over state law. His rulings helped establish a stronger central government and shaped the balance of power between the federal and state governments in the United States. John Marshall's values were centered around a strong federal government and the importance of upholding the Constitution. He believed in the principles of judicial review and the supremacy of federal law. Marshall's values emphasized the need for a stable and unified nation, with a powerful central…show more content… Maryland, the Supreme Court ruled that the federal government had the power to establish a national bank, even though the Constitution did not explicitly grant this power. Chief Justice John Marshall argued that the Necessary and Proper Clause of the Constitution allowed for implied powers, as long as they were related to the execution of the federal government's enumerated powers. This decision affirmed the supremacy of federal law over state law and strengthened the federal government's power. In McCulloch v. Maryland, Chief Justice John Marshall can be seen as a proponent of judicial activism. He believed in the power of the Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution broadly and shape the development of American law. Marshall's decisions, such as in the case of McCulloch v. Maryland, established the principle of judicial review, which allowed the Court to strike down laws deemed unconstitutional. His willingness to assert the Court's authority and shape the course of American jurisprudence demonstrates his judicial
