For thousands of years, most of mankind existed in total isolation on the continent of Africa. If Pangea had not split up, humanity would have still spread formed countries. However, there would been much more equality in the world (and lord knows we need more of that). This would because we would have all known each other since we would’ve had a ton more exposure to each other. More contact with each other, more we find in common, less fighting. Speaking of fighting, with only one land, there would be less …show more content…
Countries that invaded other countries couldn’t bring strange and foreign germs if none existed! Every country would have the same immunity and the same diseases (which is both a blessing and a sin).
The life on Pangea would be far less diverse. The biggest part of new speciation from the development of old species stems from geographical isolation. Consider the large island of Madagascar, which broke off from Gondwanan about 160 million years ago (Gondwanan was the southern half of Pangaea). About nine out of ten of the mammal and plant species that evolved on the island cannot be found anywhere else on the Earth!
A locked-in Pangaea would constrain life's possibilities since much of its interior would be hot and arid, "Because of Pangaea's size, moisture-bearing clouds would lose most of their moisture before getting very far inland," Damian Nance, a geoscience professor at Ohio University, told Life's Little