It can thus be argued that Rousseau had an indirect influence on the Revolution through his appeals to the emotions, enthusiasm, and a belief in the human perfectibility by serving the purposes of Robespierre. Robspierre used Rousseau’s language, and exploited several of his ideals in the course of the Terror, although he did appear to confuse Rousseau’s notion of general will with public liberty. Rousseau defines sovereignty as the exercise of will, not power. He attacks the traditional standing of the separation of powers which, since it defines sovereignty as power, can attribute different forms or domains of power to different instances within the state. He does have a form of separation of powers, but it is not a division of sovereignty. Thus, power in Rousseau’s state is based on the general will of the people, for only when people work for the common interest can they achieve any real freedom from autocracy. Those who do not want to submit to the general will or common interest of the people, they will be “forced to be free.” Therefore, to Rousseau, the government that represents the general will cannot be questioned, because the general will cannot be wrong. It is this notion that Robespierre misunderstands as public liberty. Nevertheless, Robespierre often eulogised Rousseau in public speech, “…one man, by the elevation of his soul and the grandeur of his character, showed himself worthy of the position teacher of the human race…Ah! If he had been witness to this revolution of which he was the precursor…”, but it is through His Cult of the Supreme Being, that Rousseau’s influence on Robespierre becomes