Thrasymachus’ argument that the strong will always rule the weaker and thusly will establish justice that would benefit themselves would be true were it not for several issues with his argument. These issues vary from problems he does not address to general implications that do not provide a gracious view of the world. These problems pose a very severe issue if Thrasymachus does not go on to address them. The absence of an addressment of a happenstance would the “weaker” populous to rebel, and win, creates a weaker argument for Thrasymachus.
The idea put forth that the strong rule the weak and the mighty establish laws and a justice that benefits them does not allow for the populous to form a rebellion. Perhaps a possible response that Thrasymachus
