Initially people would be forced to sell their organs to pay rent. The estimated price—perhaps in the range of $100,000 per kidney—would be less than the cost of dialysis (more than $70,000 per patient per year), even taking into account transplant surgery, and so the donor fee would be paid by insurers, including Medicare and Medicaid (“All About Donation”). In India people are being forced to sell their body parts to survive. And a scarcity of donors means the grim and illegal organ trade is thriving. Body parts should not be treated as commodities. If selling organs was legal then rich people would have an unfair advantage over someone who has less money. …show more content…
With the 7-1 ratio there can be an increase in crimes for people’s body parts. Trafficking in organs is a crime that occurs in three broad categories. In the first category of criminal organ trade, traffickers force or deceive victims into giving up an organ. In the second category, victims formally or informally agree to sell an organ and are cheated because they do not pay for the organ or are paid less than the promised price. The third vulnerable people are treated for ailment, ("Organ Trafficking: An International Crime Infrequently Punished”.) Globalism combined with supply and demand economics means that developed countries, which demand more organs than can be domestically supplied, seek out donors in developing nations to provide organs and meet their demands, often illegally ("Organ Trafficking: An International Crime Infrequently