Nicholas Fellows has given a contrasting opinion to Vergil and McGurk, asserting that Warbeck wasn’t actually a big threat compared to Simnel by saying ‘The revolt had been easily contained and Warbeck, unlike Simnel, had been unable to force the King into a pitched battle’ – this is true, as Henry was able to simply arrest Warbeck whereas with Simnel he had to use his own forces. The threat of Warbeck had lasted around 7 years before he was arrested – considerably longer than the threat of Simnel and the later “Devises” plot, though both of which came closer to success than Warbeck had. As with Simnel, Warbeck was only impersonating someone with a claim to the throne and had no legitimate claim himself, which contrasts with the cases of Lady Jane Grey and Mary Queen of Scots. This brings me to believe that the threat posed by Perkin Warbeck to the future of the Tudor Dynasty was not as significant as the threats posed by Lambert Simnel, Lady Jane Grey and Mary Queen of