The passages present a discussion about arguments concerning Highway 17 being expanded from a two-lane highway to a four-lane thoroughfare. This is an important debate for residents of Oak Falls because of the potential impact on the community. The two positions argue whether or not the expansion will have a positive effect on the economy and jobs of Oak Falls. Both view points have valid claims warranting consideration. For example, evidence suggests that by moving the highway two miles east of Oak Falls, the community will lose business, therefore reducing the amount of jobs available to residents; in contrast, other evidence suggests the expanded highway will attract large business chains and give residents more…show more content… For instance, in 2001 a study performed in Texas proved that bypasses can reduce traffic by up to 75% through towns. This means that a fewer number of large trucks will be driving through the area, significantly reducing congestion and noise caused by traffic. Furthermore, the reduced amount of large vehicles passing through the area will lessen the cost of road maintenance, saving tax dollars. In brief, by reducing congestion and noise caused by traffic, Oak Falls will be a more peaceful and quiet place to visit. The counterargument that Oak Falls will suffer from the expansion of Highway 17 has valid points too. For example, local businesses may suffer due to the fact that tourists may choose to frequent businesses nearer the highway. In addition, jobs created to help expand the highway will be lost once construction is complete, leaving only low paying jobs for members of the community. Although these points make a compelling argument, the case that Oak Falls will benefit from the expansion of Highway 17 is still the stronger
