Humanism In Frankenstein

Words: 500
Pages: 2

Leopold describes a conservationist as a person who works with nature and shares the benefits nature provides. I have always thought of a conservationist as someone who stood up for the forest when people were cutting down trees for timber and who became a voice for the animals when they were becoming extinct as a result of overhunting or habitat destruction. My version of a conservationist made sure the forest is a restricted area that holds endangered species and checks over it once in a while. Purdy’s post-humanist idea, on the other hand, depicts humans as the destroyers of nature. Thus, they should rely on their government to control their appetite for more land and destruction. This doesn’t go along with Leopold’s idea of living in harmony with nature. …show more content…
Humans and nature have coexisted for millennia and we just began to destroy it on a massive scale. This must be stopped. Humans have existed for centuries without harming nature and being a part of it as hunters and dispensing seeds as gatherers. Leopold describes the recent connection of nature and humans as “The land-relation is still strictly economic, entailing privileges but not obligations” (Leopold 203). We take no considerations or cautions when we destroy the environment. We don’t realize that we are going to harm ourselves in the long run and by being a conservationist in Leopold’s terms, we have the opportunity to save ourselves.
I thought the duty of a conservationist is to set land aside for endangered animals and plants and look over it. Preserving and repairing forestry is a conservationist’s other main objective. The endangered species act was made possible by conservationists who recognized the destruction of forests and the animals who live in them. I didn’t know that humans could be involved in such a massive scale and live along nature without altering any of its