Another critical point, as previously argued, regards the combination between intervention and the idea of colonialism, also defined as “humanitarian Imperialism” (Jean Bricmont). Both the western and the eastern part of the world have sustained this critical position. On one hand there …show more content…
So that is actually a cover to a fact of aggression”
( the real news: Ed Herman on Humanitarian Imperialism).
Despite the subjectivity of this opinion, the presence of Statism and selfinterest policy in the last cases of intervention is almost undesputable. This approach can lead to different phenomena with related overwhelming consequences, such as selectivity of responses. Unfortunately, the history has recorded different examples of this such as the nonauthotized NATO intervention in Kosovo, likely led by the fear of a refugees crisis in EU.
Furthermore, another example deserves to be mentioned. The Rwanda (1994) genocide is an evident proof that the UN mission and purposes decline when the UNSC is influenced by self interest. In April 1994, immediately after the crisis blown up, the UNSC voted to withdrawal the 90 % of peacekeepers out of Rwanda with the ghastly result of 800,000 victims in just 100 days; why? In an interview for the “Rwanda Genocide Documentary” (youtube part 4, cwninternational) Monique Mujawamariya, a human rights activists, report a “ discouraging but also enlightening conversation” with a congress officer responsible for