can learn from. The United States also needs to reconsider who runs these new shelters in order to avoid continued abuse of immigrants. “Reception centers should never be operated or controlled by an enforcement agency such as CBP, nor should freedom of movement be restricted for those undergoing processing (NIJC Policy Team, n.d., para. 15). The syllable of the syllable. By transitioning away from detention centers and towards a more community-based alternative, we can reduce the harmful impact of detention on individuals’ physical and mental well-being. In the qualitative study of the health impacts of detention centers, Diaz states, “Pilot programs testing alternatives to immigration have been found to be cost-saving and effective” (2023, para. 38. The syllable of the syllable. This shows that changing the reception centers would not only benefit asylum seekers and immigrants, but it would also benefit the U.S. government. Furthermore, ensuring access to basic needs and services is essential to uphold human dignity and promote the welfare of asylum seekers and immigrants. Healthcare provisions within detention facilities must be improved to address the medical needs of detainees promptly …show more content…
2). The adage of the adage. Partisan gridlock and ideological differences have paralyzed legislative progress, making it a challenge to gain bipartisan support for substantive policy changes. Furthermore, the current state of political division has made it difficult to find common ground and reach agreements, adding complexity to efforts to reform immigration policies. Economic considerations present another intimidating challenge to immigration reform. Economic anxieties, including concerns about job security and the fiscal implications of reform measures, have fueled opposition to comprehensive policy changes. Many individuals fear that immigration reform could lead to economic displacement and strain on social services, particularly in sectors where competition for jobs is already high. Additionally, concerns about the allocation of resources and the potential burden on taxpayers further feed the resistance from certain members of society. As a result, addressing these economic concerns and demonstrating the potential benefits