The movie keeps the momentum going until the very end so the movie keeps giving you new information which is not boring and keeps you interested. The movie also has another feature of using the references of the past like the commercials and the advertising materials which practically puts us in the shoes of the people being influenced that time and we can relate to the people. There are other speakers also not only pollan so there is a large view of opinion. This movie also describes the natural anatomy of the human body how the body loves sugar carbohydrates and fats as our body was meant to store energy but now we have food and it tells you how to see real food which unpolished and the and also fresh. The movie shows how the corn flakes and the wheat flakes were introduced in the 19th century and the reasons for it. He also discusses the genius of mother’s milk and how difficult it is for humans to produce anything as good as what nature provides, and why the Hadza tribe in Tanzania, still hunters and gatherers, don’t develop the diseases as those who eat the Western diet. Lastly, while nearly all other food documentaries tend to be heavy and depressing, In Defense of Food is not. Even while talking about subjects such as obesity and the dangers of sugar, the film somehow manages to never take the viewers down a hole of darkness. Maybe it is Michael Pollan’s comforting voice, his extremely likeable personality or the way the film is written, but I did not feel angry or upset once it was over. In fact, the movie had the opposite effect. The major point which got me to watch this movie was that it’s not like a conventional documentary where the director is trying to investigate where food comes from or how the animals are treated or the supply chain. It’s a crisp movie to show what you should eat with a simple