Inalienable Rights In Thomas Jefferson's The Declaration Of Sentiment

Words: 840
Pages: 4

Imagine being deprived of your inalienable rights, unable to have a voice because you’re subordinate to the others, punished by beating, burning and even imprisonment. This was reality of colonist, women, and slaves during the era of 1700’s and 1800’s. In Thomas Jefferson’s “The Declaration of Independence” he argued that the treatment from king George was insane towards the colonist and that they had a reason to separate from Great Britain, In Elizabeth Cady Stanton’s “Declaration of Sentiment” she advocated for women’s rights, she felt as though men and women were indifferent and deserved to be treated equally, In Fredrick Douglass “What to the slave is the fourth of July” he demonstrates how hypocritical America is. Jefferson, Stanton, and Douglass’s work all serves as a reminder that everyone has inalienable rights, and everyone has the right to exercise them.
The Declaration of independence was a period in which the colonist felt a necessity to break ties with Great Britain. It wasn’t until one felt that the treatment that they were receiving was intolerable. Jefferson asserts “The history of the present king of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object, the establishment of an
…show more content…
While making the lives of the colonist a living hell king George “has refused to pass other laws for the accommodation of large districts of people unless these people would relinquish the rights of representation the legislature [and]he has forbidden his govern to pass laws of immediate and pressing importance” (113). The question is what made the colonist feel that after all these years what king George was doing was correct? Jefferson implies that the colonist should no longer put up with king George’s selfish and greedy acts because they weren’t going to