Incontinence Argument

Words: 2053
Pages: 9

Zixiong Liu
December 12, 2014

Final Paper
On incontinence

At midnight, sitting in front of my desk, I can’t help but hate myself for not being able to resist the desire to check Facebook, or chatting with friends or whatever unrelated to studying. I have a paper to finish, yet I seem to be dragged around while having knowledge that I have to finish this task. Incontinence appears to be paradoxical, since it seems that in incontinence, what we know and what we believe have stopped guiding our actions. To resolve this paradox, Socrates even went as far as to deny that there is such a thing as incontinence (P120-1145b). On the other hand, Aristotle argues that incontinence does exist and is brought about by a deficient state of knowing and
…show more content…
Aristotle constructed his argument based on two premises: first, what is not voluntary is done by force or through ignorance (P37-1110a); second, what is involuntary causes pain and regret (P39-1110b). From these two premises, Aristotle established a trichotomy of actions with respect to its voluntariness. First, voluntary actions are whatever is not done by force or through ignorance, i.e., has an internal first principle; second, involuntary actions are those done by force or through ignorance that cause pain or regret; third, non-voluntary actions are those done by force or through ignorance and do not cause pain or regret. Therefore, in order to classify incontinent actions, it is imperative to consider whether or not they are forced or done through …show more content…
Given this premise, now assume the state of being able to recall but unable to use knowledge implies that the action done in such a condition is involuntary, then the only kind of action that remains a candidate for voluntary actions are those done with full knowledge, i.e., the actuality of knowledge. Then it follows that any voluntary action must be done through rational choice. This is absurd since “children and other animals” (P41-111b) would then also share in rational choice. Now it is safe to conclude that at least some actions done in the state of recalling but not knowing are voluntary