Indian Removal Act Dbq

Words: 925
Pages: 4
Open Document
“To deny people their human rights to challenge their very humanity.” Nelson Mandela once said. The Indian Removal Act was signed by the president at the time, Andrew Jackson on May 28, 1830. The purpose of this law was to allow the Americans to exchange the land with Indians for settlers, however, they were still forced to move by the United States government and thousands of Cherokee died from their march, which is also known as the “Trail of Tears.” The Indian Removal Act was not justified and the Indians should be allowed to stay on their land because they lived on the land first, they supported U.S. during wars and the Supreme Court allowed them to stay.
First of all, the Cherokees lived on the land before the Americans do. For example, …show more content…
Supreme Court allowed them to stay. For example, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled the state of Georgia cannot force the Cherokees off their land. “In the case of Worcester vs. Georgia (1832), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the state of Georgia couldn't force the Cherokee off of their land.” (“Allow the Cherokee to Stay”) Another example, President Andrew Jackson hold the act and he sends troops to prevent them from forcing Cherokees off the land. “President Jackson should uphold the Constitution and the treaties signed between the U.S. and the Cherokee. He should send troops to prevent Georgians from taking Cherokee land.” (“Allow the Cherokee to Stay”) This means whatever the Supreme Court say, everyone should follow including the president. The Supreme Court should be generous to the Americans to kick the Cherokees out because they did horrible things to Americans, scalping them alive and killing them. They should protect the U.S. citizens instead of Cherokees. However, the Cherokees did horrible things to the Americans is because they keep doing things that the Cherokee doesn’t feel comfortable with because they keep forcing them off the land. Everything the Cherokees did is for a reason to protect their own nation.
In conclusion, the Indian Removal Act was not justified and they should be allowed to stay on their land because they lived on the land first, they supported U.S. during wars and the Supreme Court allowed them to stay. Overall, the Indian Removal Act was not justified because of the hard dedications the Cherokees want to protect their land and nation, no matter if they get to the court and the horrible things they do to Americans, because all they want is they just want to stay on their land, where their home was started. Remember, to deny people’s right is considering to challenge their
Show More

Related Documents: Indian Removal Act Dbq

Indian Removal Act DBQ

This act authorized the government to grant unsettled lands west of the Mississippi in exchange for Indian lands within already established state borders. A few tribes went peacefully; nevertheless, many resisted (The). Jackson supported the act primarily because he believed that relocating the Indians would separate them from immediate contact with settlements of whites, free them from State powers, and…

Words 652 - Pages 3

Indian Removal Act DBQ

occupied Georgia, the Cherokee indians lived in the land that is now Northern Georgia. They created a very organized civilization with a written language, newspaper, and even written constitutions. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was justified because the Cherokee were harmful to the Americans, the Americans wanted to expand more west, and the Cherokee were going to get more land than they originally had. The Cherokee had been harmful to the Americans. The indians scalped Americans and killed them…

Words 533 - Pages 3

Dbq Indian Removal Act

The Indian Removal Act in 1830 was a relocation of the Indians from the eastern part of the United States to the West. President Andrew Jackson provided federal land for the Indians, west of the Mississippi River. Many people debate whether Jackson’s decision to remove the Indians was ethical. I believe Jackson used his decision to remove the Indians to prevent further conflict; he then was generous to allow them to make a profit off their land, and provided a place where the Indians could function…

Words 636 - Pages 3

Dbq Indian Removal Act

As the Indian Removal Act took place. Many controversies were brought up with the white settlers and the President. Behalf, President Andrew Jackson defends his beliefs and rights among the treaty. However disagreements were among his points of arguing. The Native American are embraced, nor can they protect their land, and should be better off living in the west. Where the Five Civilized Tribes suffered through this era of momentous. In the mid-1880s, Native American tribes. Started to adjoin the…

Words 576 - Pages 3

Indian Removal Act DBQ

Introduction Did you ever wonder what was the Indian Removal Act and how it affected Native Americans and the United States in 1830? Well, you are in luck! Today, I am going to inform you about reasons the Indian Removal Act was created, events that occurred following the enforcement of this act and the impact it had on Native Americans and the United States. According to Gutschenritter's Like A Historian handout (2018), the Indian Removal Act was first introduced by President Andrew Jackson…

Words 663 - Pages 3

Indian Removal Act Of 1830 Dbq

The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was significant because its purpose was to save the Indians from extinction. Unfortunately it added to the country’s national debt and created a divisional hatred towards President Jackson. It is understood that President Jackson had seen firsthand Native tribes becoming extinct trying to live side by side with white people. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 prevented many other tribes from becoming extinct by separating…

Words 1959 - Pages 8

Dbq Summary: The Jacksonian Democracy

DBQ #4 The Jacksonian Democrats, the supporters and follower of Andrew Jackson were a party system that believed in greater democracy for the common man; their platform consisted of political democracy, individual liberty, and equality of economic opportunity, however, their doings from 1820 through 1830 show otherwise. The political democracy was not as the Jacksonians placed it to be, citizens were being influenced by the prejudice of itś head leader Andrew Jackson. Although, Andrew Jackson and…

Words 1062 - Pages 5

Jacksonian Democracy Dbq Essay

Kathy Dai M. Galvin AP USH Period 1 Jacksonian Democracy DBQ The Jacksonian democracy of the 1820s-1830s is often associated with an expansion of the political influence, economic opportunities, and social equality available to “the common man,” a concept of the masses which President Andrew Jackson and his newly founded Democratic party came to represent. The new administration certainly saw gains for the majority; namely, public participation in government increased to unprecedented…

Words 1214 - Pages 5

United States and Essential Questions Essay

following: the degree to which they fully and directly answer the question, the strength of thesis statement, level and effectiveness of analysis, amount and quality of supporting evidence, and organizational quality. In addition to these standards, DBQs are graded on the basis of the degree to which a significant number of the documents have been used to support the thesis, and the amount and quality of outside information included in the response. Course Texts: Textbook: Brinkley, Alan…

Words 7288 - Pages 30