Easterbrook writes, “Intelligent-design thinking does not propound any specific faith or even say that the higher power is divine. It simply holds that there must be an unseen intellect in the cosmos” (345). Henderson would disagree with Easterbrook’s statement because the “unseen intellect in the cosmos” is just another phrase for some higher power in the world and it would just be teaching students about Creationism. Henderson writes, “If the Intelligent Design theory is not based on faith, but instead another scientific theory, as is claimed, then you must also allow our theory to be taught, as it is based on science, not on faith” (349). Henderson creates this parallel religion that is similar to Christianity to prove that Easterbrook’s Intelligent Design would be teaching students about religion and God. Henderson refutes Easterbrook’s Intelligent Design because it too similar to creationism and has nothing to do with science, thus proven by his satirical