Intent of 2nd Amendment Essay

Submitted By benkassaw
Words: 795
Pages: 4
Open Document
The 5.3 Million Americans That Can’t Vote

As of 2004 over 5.3 Million Americans have been denied the right to vote. Not because of age, residency or sanity, but because of disenfranchisement. Disenfranchisement is the taking away of voting rights. By disenfranchising Americans you are taking away their Constitutional Rights, therefore the question that a lot of Americans are asking is, should felons in America be given the right to vote? The overwhelming amount of research done has pointed to one answer, YES! Therefore, felons should be allowed to vote for representation within the Government, when said felons have met civil and societal conditions. There are many sides to this subject. On one side we hear people say “felons have made bad choices in there lives, why would we ever trust them to vote for the better of America” (John Conyers, Jr., LLB, U.S. Representative (D-MI), Mar. 15, 2005 bill H.R. 1300, the Civic Participation and Rehabilitation Act of 2005). On the other side of the argument we hear “We let ex-convicts marry, reproduce, buy beer, own property and drive. They don't lose their freedom of religion, their right against self-incrimination or their right not to have soldiers quartered in their homes in time of war. But in many places, the assumption is that they can't be trusted to help choose our leaders... If we thought criminals could never be reformed, we wouldn't let them out of prison in the first place"(Steve Chapman, StarTribune of Minneapolis-St. Paul 23-24). Furthermore, the U.S. Constitution stated in Amendment XV, which was ratified by the states in 1870: “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous conditions…” Many of Americans believe that the day your debt to society is paid you should get your voting rights back. When felons are released from prison they are told to reintegrate into society and to become a good upstanding member of society once again. Consider this, “laws in America forbid felons from voting; but by denying prisoners the right to vote is likely to undermine respect for the rule of law... Allowing prisoners to vote, by contrast, may strengthen their social ties and commitment to the common good, thus promoting legally responsible participation in civil society"( Manza, Jeff, and Christopher Uggen. "Locked Out: Felon Disenfranchisement." University of Minnesota American Democracy (2006): 12+. Print). If we would allow felons to vote then those felons would feel more connected to America and the community they live in. America went to war with England in 1775 for many reasons; one reason was that the new colonies were being taxed without representation. This is known today as taxation without representation. Today over 5.3 million Americans are facing the same injustice. David S. Mitchell, Professor for Department of Sociology at the University of Colorado said this:
"Ex-felons who manage to become gainfully employed are still required to pay taxes even though they are denied the benefits associated with those duties such as the ability to elect their representatives or to decide on policies that will govern their lives, and lives of their families. Centuries ago this prospect of
Show More

Related Documents: Intent of 2nd Amendment Essay

Second Amendment Argumentative Analysis

the 2nd Amendment and guns from a deeper perspective, we see why it is such a controversial issue. Guns, especially now, contribute to numerous fatalities and devastatingly affect the American people, elevating the question: “Is it time to place stricter checks on guns?” We must ask this because statistics show that in 2014, the US had the 18th highest firearm-related homicide rate in the world, making it the highest death rate of developed countries. We must…

Words 1329 - Pages 6

Justice Alito Case Summary

notably the 2nd and the 14th amendments. The case is originally set up via a previous ruling of District of Columbia v. Heller, which protected right to bear arms for the purpose of self-defense, in response to D.C.’s law, banning firearms in the home. Due to this ruling, the people of the Chicago suburb Oak Park sued the city in saying that the banning of firearms in Oak Park is leaves the community vulnerable to criminals, citing a overstepping of the 2nd and the 14th Amendments, specifically…

Words 1856 - Pages 8

Pros And Cons Of Gun Control

imbecile who has the intent to kill like a sociopath and guns. These events lead to a divide in the nation where there is a political battle between three sides: the reds, the whites, and the blues. The worst part, our extraordinary government needs to do a lot more about it. The concerned citizens of this nation are speaking up. These concerned citizens are divided into three sides in this battle on future security. The blues are looking for a reconsideration of the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution…

Words 929 - Pages 4

Why Do Stricter Gun Control Laws Work?

There is a lot of controversy over the 2nd amendment. Gun rights advocates claim that the right is unlimited, and trying to limit it is violating their rights. The article “Gun control laws simply do not work.” states that “The main reason gun control doesn’t work is because laws will not prevent…

Words 1561 - Pages 7

Essay on Chapter 5 Review Questions

What rights are protected I the First Amendment? 5. What makes the 2nd Amendment so controversial? 6. What do the 4, 5, 6 and 8th amendments focus on? 7. Does the government have the right to take your property and if so, from where do they get that right? 8. What is the purpose of the 9th Amendment? 9. Describe what each of the following Amendments do: 13, 14, and 15. 10. With the exception of the 21st Amendment, what type of right was addressed in all Amendments after the 15th (that dealt with defining…

Words 988 - Pages 4

Compare And Contrast Essay On Gun Control

not. Taking away the mother’s weapon has nothing to do with the intent of the lioness. This same concept applies to the ethical gun control point of view. Many American’s will not come off of their guns because anyone who wants to kill, will kill. People want their guns, and the ones who want their guns bad enough will kill to keep them, because many brave men and women died and killed so Americans could keep them.“The Second Amendment protects an individual right that existed before the creation of…

Words 588 - Pages 3

gun control Essay

of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” This right was taken for granted for nearly 150 years until several high profile crimes were committed with “assault style weapons.” Now a passionate debate swirls around the second amendment. The main question is whether the founding fathers intended for the average citizen to be able to own firearms, particularly firearms that historically were the purview of a state’s military. Through historical perspective, social, and economic arguments…

Words 1508 - Pages 7

Gun Control Essay examples

like myself who are firm believers in our 2nd Amendment. The second Amendment states that, “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”. (Constitutional Amendments, (1789)). The Second Amendment most recently has been interpreted, “to grant the right of gun ownership for purposes that include self-defense.” Through the mechanism of the Fourteenth Amendment it has been applied to the states. (Cornell…

Words 1422 - Pages 6

Articles Of Confederation Vs Constitution

The Articles of Confederation and the Constitution are the two constituents that United States worked under. Both the documents are similar in many ways. They were Documents formed by the same people. However, these documents are much more dissimilar than they resemble each other. Below are a few comparison points between the two documents. The formal name of the nation in the Articles was- “The United States of America”; and the Constitution name was “the United States of America”. In the…

Words 1166 - Pages 5

Senate: Supreme Court of the United States and Judicial Restraint- Judicial Essay

judges interpret the constitution. There are several different methods or schools of thought on how judges interpret the Constitution. Some see the constitution as dead, and interpret it in a textualist manner, some try to apply the Framers’ original intent, whilst some see the Constitution as a living document that changes over time. Judicial review- this is the precedent which allows Justices to declare laws as unconstitutional. This precedent was established by Marbury vs Madison 1803, allowing…

Words 782 - Pages 4