In a John Hopkins University study, hyperparenting was more closely related to increased anxiety in children than the mental health of the parent or parental rejection” (p.26). I can see what she wants to say that this is fact from the credible company made the research. In that reason, people can believe what she says is true. However, there is no proving that when the research is made. If there is no information about the research, people cannot believe the research. Without the information of research mentioning make it a weak argument.
The second weakness in her article, it seems she is angry to tiger moms that they make their children weak. Using her languages sounds strong and speaks in a threatening tone. It makes people think every case of tiger moms is bad for their children. However, it is not true that some cases of tiger moms make their children have success life. It might not be a bad result for every …show more content…
The psychological article that she presents are very interesting and she does a good job of arguing her writing with her own personal experiences. Moreover, when I read this article, I strongly agree with her opinion. On the other hand, it is not very clear whether there is no proving in the research of the date of Johns Hopkins University research, which necessarily mentioned. Additionally, she is not an expert on this topic in this article. She wrote this article only with her small experience that seems people not make this article believe. Therefore, it may be better to write after when she has done with her own research, so she can have more strong opinion that she want to say about the tiger moms. If she has done the research by herself, she would not say strongly argued. She could see many cases of tiger moms who having successful children’s