Harte and London's story share very similar elements as naturalism authors. Obviously both Harte and London are similar since they both write about realism, more specifically naturalism. Both authors works exhibit accurate depiction of detail. In Harte and London's tales, the ending is realistic about the death of the main characters, which depicts the real aspect of life and nature. Harte and London use the same settings to kill characters. In to OPF (Outcasts of Poker Flat), the setting of a harsh winter kills the Duchess and Piney, and …show more content…
Harte uses third person limited omniscient, yet London uses third person omniscient. Harte choose a limited omniscient third person view in order to know one character's thoughts. However, Jack London choose a third person omniscient point of view to show the difference in thought between the Man's thinking and reality. The tone for Bret Harte is ironic and foreboding. OPF uses irony and foreboding to show that fate always turns. London's tone however, is dispassionate and sometimes judgmental. London chooses this tone to show how foolish and wrong the Man thinks and acts.The themes in each of the stories are completely different. OPF suggests the theme is bad people can also do good deeds. In BF, the theme is never underestimate Mother Nature. Harte and London have two polar characters. Harte's main character is "cool" and levelheaded. London's main character is arrogant and selfish. Both authors are very unique and different from each other. Both Bret Harte and Jack London are fantastic naturalism authors. The two authors works have expert detection of detail, realistic elements, settings, and isolation. However, they still differ in point of view, tone, themes, and characters. Bret Harte and Jack London are similar yet completely different naturalist