Jackson's Strict Interpretation Of The Constitution

Words: 437
Pages: 2

Jackson and his supporters were not guardians of the Constitution and for the common people. He wanted a strict interpretation of the Constitution, freedom and expanded opportunities for people, but did not follow through with his beliefs. Jackson also believed in having more power for the federal government over state government. Many people did not appreciate or agree with Jackson. Jackson made decisions based on personal reasons over political benefits. He had a spoil system where he fired cabinet members because they wouldn’t follow his crazy ideas. Jackson believed the national bank was “a monopoly of the foreign and domestic exchange” and wasn’t necessary. Henry Clay tried to renew the bank’s charter and Jackson shut it down. When he wanted to remove the funds from the Bank of the U.S, before the charter ended, the Department of Treasury would not follow his crazy orders. Jackson fired him and every single cabinet member until they agreed to take the money out and give it to “pet banks” for each state. Daniel Webster who was for the bank said the freedom of people wasn’t being harmed, so Jackson was acting on impulsion instead of thinking about things first. …show more content…
The Native Americans took this case to court. In the Cherokee Nation vs Georgia, the supreme court ruled in favor of the Cherokees. Jackson was the head of the executive board and made the final decision, he decided to force them out of their home. Jackson brought an army and followed them 2500 miles from Georgia to Oklahoma in order for them to permanently leave. This long walk was known as the “Trail of Tears.” As “The Working Men’s Declaration of Independence” said, “Any man, no matter what his background is had the rights of happiness, life, and liberty.” Jackson clearly didn’t believe in this because he ruined the lives of all the