There are strong arguments that despite the different times and places of the two, there are several deep similarities between the conversion stories. In a way, both Jacob Rolandu and Michael Sunbloom were on a journey to find themselves. They were searching for something bigger in life and trying to figure out who they really were and what they believed in. A Conversion in the Family allows readers to reflect on religious experiences and the ways in which individuals incorporate their beliefs within the context of their families and communities. By sharing his own story of conversion, Harline offers an exploration of the complexities of faith and the transformative power of personal conviction. Ultimately, whether one converts to Mormonism,…show more content… Therefore, when a Dutch individual converted, it wasn't just about their beliefs, but they had to navigate the complex web of religious tensions and societal expectations, while weighing the risks and benefits of their conversion in their society. Meanwhile, in America, the 1970s had different sets of cultural standpoints. This was a time of significant social and cultural turbulence, fueled by the civil rights movement, the Vietnam War, and the rise of countercultural movements. Traditional norms and institutions were being challenged, and individuals were encouraged to question authority and explore alternative lifestyles. With this, Americans grew weary of old traditions and desired the search for new ways of living. Therefore, when an American converted, it wasn’t like the Dutch. Rather, it was more about breaking free from societal norms and beginning the journey down their own unique path. Additionally, the consequences of these conversions are very different. In the Netherlands, religious conversion could bring serious trouble, while in America there was more freedom to explore different beliefs without facing these
