John Brown Argumentative Essay

Brown throughout that entire night acted like a God whose purpose was to dictate who should live of die. According to the fellow abolitionists John not only decided who would live or die but he never participated in the murder itself. Later he was questioned over the events of Pottawatomie Creek and every time he was, John responded evasively. Brown’s band of abolitionists sparked the start of “Bleeding Kansas” due to the violent response they had to the violent pro-slavery men at Lawrence. They had turned Kansas into a war zone in which guerrilla warfare was the form of attack. Brown became known to anti-slavery followers as a hero christian warrior and to pro-slavery he was a vicious and insane murderer (McGlone, Robert E.). This event was the start of the controversy over John Brown, was he simply an anti-slavery …show more content…
His desire for freedom for all was displayed constantly in his actions making him a hero for the free. While violent, raised in poor conditions, John Brown didn’t have many ways to make an impact and help make all men free. John Brown was a man of radical ideas that proved to make impacts on the lives of many. He may have seemed like a mad man but once all facts are brought to the table one can see how John may have turned out the way he had. Between his parents ideologies and his witness of an African American boy beaten by shovel, how could he not have been forced to act. Forced to try with all the power he had to make all men free and remove slavery. His mother believed that the messiah would return if slavery would end. The fact that he would be saving the lives of many surely influenced him for he was a religious man as well. It would be wrong to write this man off as a terrorist or a madman. He was more of a radical abolitionist who wasn’t afraid to take action to make all men free. He was prepared to do anything required, including dieing for the

Show More

Related Documents: John Brown Argumentative Essay

Essay on Lincoln rhetorical