In Book I, Locke states that if there are any innate principles, then everyone would assent to them. By arguing with the nativist Locke puts forward solid evidence that supports whatever is is and nothing can be and not be at the same time. He uses example of the blind trying to describe color or the deaf describing sound. It would be impossible for either to do if they have always been blind or deaf since they are not able to …show more content…
Perception is the chosen word because it is due to the secondary quality as to the outcome to how each person receives it. If someone was blind they may be able to tell that they are holding a telephone because they can hear it ring when someone is calling. However, they wouldn’t be able to tell what the background color on the display screen or what name or number showed in the Caller ID was because they couldn’t see it. Someone without that disability could see the phone, feel the phone, and hear it ringing. They might describe a secondary quality description of the color of the display being bright red as where someone else might call it crimson. The secondary quality is an independent relationship between the object and the