Johnson, Nixon And Clinton Impeachment Analysis

Words: 493
Pages: 2

The job of president is a difficult one and undoubtedly never smooth-sailing. While all of the presidents take the same oath at the beginning of their term, not all of them are able to abide by the rules. Some of them have abused their power which has led to consequences. When misconduct reaches a certain point, charges against the president can be presented in front of the court of justice with a trial ensuing to decide whether or not to end the presidency in question. There were three of our presidents in particular faced impeachment for varying reasons: Johnson, Nixon, and Clinton.

Andrew Johnson became president following Abraham Lincoln’s assassination and he served from 1865 to 1869. In my eyes, he was impeached for sticking to his guns and refusing to compromise his beliefs. He had composed a plan for the South to rejoin the Union, but it was seen as too forgiving by a lot of the Republicans in Congress and this led to neither party being able to come to an agreement because of the substantial differences. What really got the ball rolling on his impeachment was his violation of the Tenure of Office Act when he removed the secretary of war from the cabinet. Johnson ended up being impeached by the House on February 24, 1868, but was acquitted by the skin
…show more content…
He ended up resigning the day after a recommendation for impeachment was given by the House of Representatives Judiciary Committee. He was part of an enormous political scandal that was made up of his men attempting to break into the Watergate Hotel in Washington D.C. in order to steal information from his political adversaries. This led to him being investigated by the government and shortly after he realized he wasn’t going to be able to beat the charges. He stepped down with facing charges of not only lying to the people and congress, but also for the obstruction of