The Judd vs Drezga case is critical case addressing the economic impact of law suits on doctor’s or healthcare organizations. The statutory limitation enacted by the legislature to limit damages recoverable by victims in malpractice actions is commendable, considering the fact that it was passed in 1986, Utah legislative predictive ability to understand the growing economic concerns by doctor’s, healthcare organizations and continuously inflation of healthcare costs. It is an act of creating balance between damages occurred to the victim and economic perspective of healthcare. Current data does prove the fact that malpractice claims (which are ever increasing) does inflate the healthcare care costs on the whole. Limiting the cap on claim is
