Jury Trial Analysis Essay example

Words: 940
Pages: 4
Open Document
Jury Trial Analysis
Fenisa Robinson
CJA-364
October 1, 2012
John Huskey Jury Trial Analysis
In the United States of America, the criminal justice system is based on the adversarial system or common law system. An adversarial trial allows the accused or defendant to be given a fair chance to prove his or her innocence. The Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution states that the defendant is to be given a fair chance to oppose the prosecution, have witnesses to help with his or her defense, face and question the complainant, and for his or her case to be heard by a group of people who are unbiased and impartial. This group is known as the trial jury.
Jury Selection. To start the process of jury selection, a group of …show more content…
Closing Arguments. Closing arguments are made by both sides; defense and prosecution. First the defense attorney will address the jury and affirm his or her position in the case by restating the facts of the case as he or she believes shows reasonable doubt. This helps to paint a mental picture of how the defense sees the case. After the defense has finished with his or her closing statement, it is the prosecutor’s turn to state his or her position with closing arguments. The closing arguments of the prosecution will attempt to persuade the jury to see beyond a reasonable doubt the defendant did, in fact, commit the crime. Once both sides have completed their closing statements, the judge directs his or her attention to the jury to clarify the meaning of the charges, evidential guidelines, and which verdicts will apply to the case.
Jury Deliberations and Verdict. The moment after he judge has instructed the jury, the jury will leave the courtroom and deliberate in a private setting. During this time the jury will reflect on the testimony heard in the courtroom and ponder over the evidence to help them make the best decision about the verdict. Whether they choose the verdict of guilty or not guilty, the decision must be unanimous. After reaching a verdict, the jurors will come back to the courtroom and announces the verdict. In the event the jury cannot come to a consensus; the
Show More

Related Documents: Jury Trial Analysis Essay example

Video Analysis: Trial By Jury

Trial by Jury Something I learned from the film Trial by Jury that I had not learned elsewhere was when trial by juries became the main method to resolve legal disputes. In the 15th century this method became the dominant one and shortly thereafter it was brought to the New World and became a part of the law in the early United States (Trial by Jury, 1999). I knew the right to a jury was included in the Constitution and Bill of Rights, but I also did not know it was not a right in England before…

Words 401 - Pages 2

Jury Trial Essay

Jury Trial Analysis Jaynice Harden March 16, 2015 CJA/364 Criminal Procedure Shane Krauser Jury Trial Analysis In today’s society, there are many people who know what a jury trial is and what is expected in the process of a jury trial. They may also know why the process is important and very necessary as it protects the citizens of the United States. The part that some people may not know about is the process that is taken during the pre-trial phase. Any and every individual that has been…

Words 1563 - Pages 7

Jeffrey Toobin Oj Simpson Defense Summary

Yorker. He took charge of writing an analysis of the OJ Simpson trial with the intent of analyzing the facts presented and how they changed the outcome of the trial. We can assume that he chose to take the lead on this article as it fell right under his expertise in the legal analysis field. This is a case that very few lawyers or analysts would take on because an author could easily display bias due to the fact that this is a very ethics and emotion based jury decision. This article Is also very…

Words 981 - Pages 4

Mayo: Jury and Plaintiff Essay

SPRING MOCK TRIAL ASSIGNMENT Written Pre-Trial Assignment (50 points) This will be completed by all students. You are to complete a written pre-trial document. It is to be typed. It shall be submitted on the first evening of the trial, April 15, 2013. Retain a copy for your use during the trial. Your paper should be between 4-8 pages in length. It should include the following: A. VOIR DIRE 1. Describe what strategy the Plaintiffs should employ in the jury selection…

Words 1383 - Pages 6

Andrea Campbell's Forensic Evidence

Forensic evidence can be beneficial in court trials. In other cases it can be misinterpreted, and the wrong people could be committed to prison. In “Forensic Science: Evidence, Clues, and investigations” by Andrea Campbell, she gives the reader multiple reasons as to why it is good and bad. This leaves the reader with one question. Is forensic evidence the most important type of evidence to present at trial? In paragraph three, Andrea informs the reader that forensic evidence is applied to answer…

Words 289 - Pages 2

Racially Based Jury Nullification Summary

This essay is a summary and analysis of the article Racially Based Jury Nullification: Black Power in the Criminal Justice System, by Paul Butler. It includes identifying the main arguments and thesis of the article, and analyzing the validity of the author’s claims. Additionally, this essay provides a critique of the support the author provides in his article. The author, Paul Butler, is a professor at Georgetown Law in Washington, specializing in race relations law and criminal theory. He was also…

Words 656 - Pages 3

Essay A Look at the Cases of Apprendi vs. New Jersey and Blackely vs. Washington

neighborhood. "Later, Apprendi pleaded guilty to weapons possession charges. Each of these counts carried a sentence of between 5 and 10 years in prison. The count was no refer to State hate crime Statue, which could increase the sentence if the trial judge preponderance of the evidence. Which proof that the defendant committed the crime because wanted to intimidate the neighbords because of their race. When Apprend pleaded guilty the prosecutor filed a motion to extend the defendant sentence…

Words 1310 - Pages 6

Criminal Justice Process

Appeals filed by attorneys in appellate courts and then ruled on by appellate judges. If an appellate court reverses a case, the case returns to trial court for retrial. With a reversal, the original trial becomes moot (that is, it is as though it never happened). Following a reversal, a prosecutor decides whether to refile or drop the charges. Even if a prosecutor drops the charges, the defendant can still be prosecuted later…

Words 1730 - Pages 7

12 Angry Men Rhetorical Analysis

questioning to last longer and appear more thorough, a performance of their commitment to the case and adept lawyerly skill. In going through these hypotheticals, jurors are also performing. They must perform like jurors in order to be accepted into the trial. This is not unlike the circumstances within the ritual initiation kut of Chini.…

Words 954 - Pages 4

Alberty-Velez V. Corporacion De Purto Rico, Defendent

from the show in November remains unclear because conflicting testimony was offered on this point at trial. Alberty testified that she had always intended to return to “Desde Mi Pueblo,” while Inserni stated that he understood there was no future commitment between Alberty and WIPR at the time of her departure. These are the facts of the case given to us in the case for ruling by the courts. Analysis This case is comparable to Licciardi in that all of the practical outcomes of a continuance would…

Words 395 - Pages 2