Just Like Ayse Summary

In Liversage’s article, she made a comparison between two migrant spouses, Ayse and Halil, and concluded that the one that has the disadvantage, whether male or female, will always be the marriage-migrant spouse. The constitution of both households has its similarities and differences. Ayse and Halil moved to Denmark and became part of an extended household, but Halil and his wife later lived independently from his spouse’s parents when they both earned enough money. Ayse, on the other hand, continued to live with her mother-in-law and her spouse. Even though she entered a family where she had financial reliance, she found herself in an unwelcoming surrounding where her mother-in-law mistreats her and was considered as the one that is “always right”. In Halil’s …show more content…
Their life within the household, to some degree, had the same story. Both Ayse and Halil needed to depend on their life partner’s abilities in Danish communication since they were the migrant who had no connections and did not know the language at all. However, Halil and his wife did all the chores together unlike in Ayse’s case where she was brutally treated like a housekeeper. In the culture of Turkey, women were required to do all the work. Knowing this, Halil was disappointed with his marriage because he wanted a household wherein his wife would do all the chores just like Ayse’s household. Ayse, then again, wanted to impart the tasks with her husband like what Halil is experiencing. Gendered access to public space is prevalent among men in Turkey. It is in Turkish culture that women were only allowed to go out if the male in the family allows them to. With this, the husband would be the one who goes out and the wife would always be the one who worries their husbands’ whereabouts. This bad experience that they encountered with their marriage can lead to household dissolution through

Show More

Related Documents: Just Like Ayse Summary

Lin01765 Ch20 Final Essay