Kant Vs Mill

Philosophical theories are many in count: fit for different likes, dislikes, and beliefs of people. As such, the theories proposed by John Stuart Mill or Immanuel Kant might seem right or wrong depending on the subjective viewpoint of the audience. One thing is for certain though, both the mentioned authors are exceptional philosophers with a huge investment in the field.
John Stuart Mill (1806-1873), a talented British philosopher, proposed various theories that set the basis for different disciplines like sociology, economy, and politics (Schefczyk).
Among others, Mill specifically concentrates on the utilitarianism theory that explains morality.
The word utilitarian explains the proposed theory – the moral worth of any action is determined …show more content…
Furthermore, the satisfaction of one’s happiness is important, but not as important as the satisfaction of a larger group’s happiness. As such, the society should seek the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people (Schefczyk).
Alongside the greatness of though by Mill, it is crucial to mention another great philosopher, Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) (Jankowiak). Even though Kant was German by origin, his exceptional philosophical theories influenced the entire world and not only the
Europe. Among the many Kantian theories put into writing, The Metaphysics of Morals is

perhaps the most special one, as it discusses moral and immoral actions, taken into consideration that these actions are actually universal (Jankowiak). Kant suggests that humans should always act in accordance to the outcomes that will provided him or her the best results. It is evident, the
Kantian theory is much different from Mill’s Utilitarianism, but which one is better or acceptable strongly various on each individual’s subjective perspective. It can be duly noted that …show more content…
In his philosophical theories, Mills acknowledges that there are different forms of Utilitarianism (direct, indirect, etc.), but despite the form, the famous philosopher admits that the first step is always the same: “… the actor should examine which of the rules (secondary principles) in the moral code of his or her society are pertinent in the given situation” (Schefczyk). Such a proclamation is crucial in understanding
Mill’s philosophy, because he categorizes human actions by different natures of their character, for example, “A virtuous person has the disposition to follow moral rules” (Schefczyk).
Furthermore, in his essay Remarks on Bentham’s Philosophy, Mill states that a man is not truly good and moral unless he or she refuses the commitment of certain actions from the mere painful though of them being wrong (Schefczyk). This is yet another proof of Mill’s acceptance of a intermediate moral rules that humans need to follow. Similarly, the moral rules are also an important part of the Kantian philosophy. In this case, Kant calls these rules “duties,” earning an essential name for his overall philosophy, deontology (deon – “duty” in Greek)

Show More

Kant Vs. Mill-A Battle Of Ethics

Philosophy Final Review Essay

Philosophy 241 Lecture Note Essay

Essay on katie s midterm for philosophy

Concept Of Abortion

Essay on History of Munsterberg

freedom of politics coursework Essay

Strengths And Weaknesses Of Legalism

Philosphy and Life is What you make of it Essay

Notes On Business Ethics