Karen Armstrong And The Eucharist Analysis

According to Karen Armstrong the history of myth is the history of humanity, our stories and beliefs, our curiosity and attempts to understand the world, which link us to our ancestors and each other. Two things Karen Armstrong includes in this interview about myth is that there is the myth as it is supposed to have happened once in historical time – Jesus at the last supper sharing his body and blood with his followers – and the myth that is forever present and forever made new – the presence of Jesus in the Eucharist is the forever renewed reliving of that mythic experience. That is, there is the actual experience that only 13 people shared in, and then the ritual deed in which billions have taken part and in a sense these are both the same experience.
In this interview with Karen Armstrong, Alan jones mentioned in the interview that he hated reading bible. According to Alan Jones the rabbinical method of reading scripture is a larger historic agenda to which the study wished to make a contribution. There are some methods that rabbis used at the time of Christ and shows examples from the teachings of Jesus. It also considers the literary device of parables, which was extensively used by Jesus as we can see in the New Testament. …show more content…
'Before the modern period, Jews, Christians and Muslims all relished highly allegorical interpretations of scripture. The word of God was infinite and could not be tied down to a single interpretation. Armstrong supports the argument that Biblical literalism is (or should be) a straw man by giving an account of the writing of the Old and New Testaments. Because the historical situation of the Jews is to convey in an artistic way their place in the universe (or the human condition in general), to affirm and interpret

Show More

Related Documents: Karen Armstrong And The Eucharist Analysis

Goblin Market and Rossetti Essay