3). He theorizes that highly-integrated systems are composed of various interacting elements as patterns emerge due to the relations and interactions among those systems. To understand the system, all the components within and between the levels of the system need to be in collaboration. Therefore, reducing the system, or breaking the system into smaller components, forces the system to lose its interactions and complexity. However, Kelso’s primary interest focuses on open, non-equilibrium systems as he theorizes that these open systems can interact with the surrounding environment by exchanging energy, matter, and information. Therefore, over time, Kelso theorizes that movement patterns change as individuals are surrounded by various constraints that cause the motor system to naturally adapt, self-organize, and emerge new movement …show more content…
Kelso references Roger Penrose, a mathematical physicist, and disagrees with his beliefs that consciousness can be found in a single place as Kelso theorizes that consciousness and all other brain functions occur due to the coordination and interaction among different places. I thought this concept was interesting as I agree with Kelso that consciousness cannot be found in a specific spot within the nervous system or the brain. In addition, I found it interesting that Penrose believes that it will be possible to elucidate consciousness through correct quantum mechanics. Personally, this sounds as if Penrose thinks of the brain as a physics equation rather than a complex, dynamical system that thrives off interactions between sub-components. However, even though I disagree with Penrose, I found it interesting that Kelso included Penrose’s point of view regarding consciousness as it was interesting to