Kievan Russia Leadership

Words: 688
Pages: 3

As Kievan Rus Russia was empowered and growing they were an organized group of small states ruled by a prince for each state and everybody paid a tribute to a grand prince who ruled over them all, As leadership did not pass from father to son this became a problem as it was passed by seniority and power, which brought about divisions among the leadership as these men grappled for seniority and power. After a period of time and as internal failures only made things worse. Additional problems occurred as things were going bad around the area, Mongols from the east saw this as an opportunity as they saw weakness and after several battles, they took control of the land/s and this became the Golden Horde Time. A modern-day mindset for the Russian came out of this time and has been a major mindset for Russian leadership even today " A strong desire to defend its long and open borders" which remains in the forefront of leadership today.

In Vladimir-Suzdal, which now became know as Moscow, the princes of Kievan Rus tired to bring back their rule but it did not work as they stayed subservient to the Tatars, when there was a split and as Moscow
…show more content…
SO, Tsar, Peter the great got new ideas from the West and transformed the country, The only thing he did not change, in fact, pushed it harder was the principle of service to the state and he pushed it harder than ever before. Then he went on a spree to obtain the iron ore deposits, and he built things that benefited the land. Catherine II a Germann came and made her mark on the land as she brought arts and education but she did nothing to help the serfs, as she helped the power of the landlords grew and become more powerful. Over the years Russia became fundamentally the same, Autocratic, state-centered as they relied upon expansion, not innovation.Thye stated this way until World War I and then had