King Lear Research Paper

SIGNIFICANCE

Most of the people are not aware of the term hamartia, this thesis will make them aware of it. In literature, hamartia is the flaw in character which leads to the downfall of the protagonist in a tragedy. In this work, I am going to relate hamartia with the play "King Lear" by William Shakespeare. Like the other tragedies, this play also presents a hero who suffers misfortunes and meets a tragic fate. In King Lear, the main protagonist of the novel has a tragic flaw which made him face a tragic end. Lear's flaw is his hasty temper and misjudgment. I am going to discuss the character of Lear and his tragic flaw. So the readers will get the idea about him and his hamartia and also about the fundamental qualities of a tragic hero …show more content…
He was a third of eight children of John Shakespeare and Mary Arden, his father was most prosperous men in town. In 1582, he married Anne Hathaway. He had three children, Sussanah and two twins, Judith and Hamnet. John Whitney says it is troublesome for a student to understand a writer who lived 400 years ago. But this difficulty can disappear when you tell them that they and Shakespeare have a great deal in common. Shakespeare was from a business family, the son of a glove merchant and butcher who did a stint as a mayor of flourishing market town. He was a poet, an actor and a playwright obviously; but he was also a businessman, shareholder in the most successful theater company of his time, a servant of the king, and by the end of his life, one of the wealthiest men in his hometown of Stratford-upon-Avon. He was certainly no stranger to money, debt, business plans and his plays reflect this …show more content…
He has written a vast numbers of tragic plays. His tragedies are masterpiece of art. These are five act plays ending in the death of one of the main protagonist. The Elements of Shakespearean Tragedy are a troublesome subject. The most broadly respected perspective is that Shakespeare utilized the model of catastrophe set up by Aristotle. Shakespeare unquestionably took after some of Aristotle's thoughts, however not every one of them or reliably. The primary gathering comprises of Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, and Macbeth. These are the four awesome tragedies and best take after the Aristotelian model. They are broadly viewed as the Shakespeare "mind" tragedies. They all have a hero that has a tragic flaw that in the end prompts his downfall. In Shakespeare's plays, be that as it may, the lamentable imperfections are less discernable. Aristotle tended to overstate the imperfection, while Shakespeare makes it all the more genuine, as his plays are universal. This is just about the main thing it has in a similar manner as the Aristotelian catastrophe however. Shakespeare wanted to make an entangled plot with numerous sub-plots so as to make the play a great deal all the more genuine, significant and universal to the audience. Hence, he didn't confine his tragedies to the established solidarities. The cleansing is another distinction. Shakespeare's plays don't end with the feeling that everything is ended. Rather, the plays end

Show More