This being why he had reason to fight back against the English, which supports my argument. I will also use Increase Mather as a primary source. His recall of the war is different than the other primary sources because he recalls the English did nothing wrong and were fighting a defensive war and were assaulted by the natives for no reason. And with the evidence I get from my primary and secondary sources I hope to disprove him. For my secondary sources, I will use Abbot, Irving, and Burke. I chose Abbots, History of King Philip, Sovereign Chief of the Wampanoag’s: Including the Early History of the Settlers of New England, because he is against my argument. He talks about how it was Philips fault the English and Wampanoag did not get along. He stated that the English only took the land they were honestly