Kipnis Against Love

Words: 585
Pages: 3

Against Love: A Polemic explores the notion and the origin of love, marriage, and the freedom using the social and historical background. Kipnis turns attention to the fact that it is only the recent tendency to equal marriage and romantic love that caused many difficulties and problems caused by the illusion that passion love leads to good marriage and opposite. The important question that Kipnis ask: is it all about the lack of freedom and human desire to escape from the modern rationally-organized world into the love affair?
One of the popular modern attitude towards good relationship is working on the marriage that may be expressed in the form of family therapy or other common efforts aiming to deal with the routine and loosing interest that partners experience. Unfortunately can not always give the expected positive results as paradoxically, the more you work, the less it helps(Kipnis). It seems that the passionate love is usually connected with losing control: “You're in love, or you're in lust, and not with your mate, and your life feels out of control, and maybe you've been waiting your whole life to feel this way about someone, which means you're in big trouble”. The author suggests that the nature of passionate love is irrational, that is why one can not improve it by making
…show more content…
However, religion can be considered as probably the oldest legal way to leave the rational world and finally lose control. It must be admitted that not all religious practices contain this, for example, Christian religion developed into the logical rational system doubtfully able to give a person such an experience. However, early Christianity, Buddhist practices, even radical Islam provide the wide range of possibilities of losing control. It is worth to note that most religions still give the option to break the social ties becoming a monk and ignoring the competition and rat race