If the region was suitable for agriculture and was big enough for agriculture than who ever dominated that region would have great influence on the governments or tribes or the tribes of that time. Professor Mizocuhi uses the topography of Japan to show that relationships between groups of people and their social networks had a greater impact on the hierarchies and the government than the individuals impact on hierarchies which ends up being the strongest point the professor makes. Another point that the professor touches upon is the impact of nodes on the hierarchies and government. Nodes in this paper means what the region was know for and what they did for livings. The nodes helped lead to the creation of a single hierarchy in Japan. He also touches upon the impact that the trade of these nodes had on the cultures of Japan. So in turn Professor Mizocuhi argues throughout his paper that there were many factors that led to creation of a centralized hierarchy in Japan and each specific factor had a great influence on the formation of a centralized hierarchy. The article adds a new perspective to an old argument about how Japan’s centralized hierarchy was developed. In the paper he seems to never discredit