Krakauer Vs Mccandless

Words: 1945
Pages: 8

Self-confidence escorts humanity to success, just as a lack of self-confidence leads to failure. The most successful people in the world got to where they are today with confidence. Self-confidence is a superpower that allows for the unimaginable. It opens doors and opportunities that aren’t visible to the blind eye. Many artists, authors, and actors possess a level of confidence that the mere human may never understand. In the novel Into the Wild, Jon Krakauer lets out his self-confidence. Even while narrating a character like Chris McCandless, he finds a loophole in sneaking in props for himself. He uses tactics interwoven throughout the book, but he takes two chapters in particular to talk solely about himself. He makes it appear that he is just relating his …show more content…
He also applies his personal experiences because they parallel McCandless’s life events. Both Krakauer and McCandless have past issues with their father figures. The two men have been deeply affected by their situations in similar ways. By addressing their similarities, Krakauer gradually builds his credibility. If the reader pities Krakauer, they will pity McCandless in return. Alongside narration and reflection, Krakauer uses travel writing to persuade the reader of his resolute personality: “I knew that people sometimes died climbing mountains. But at the age of twenty-three, personal morality—the idea of my own death—was still largely outside my conceptual grasp” (151). Krakauer realizes now that he could have died on his journey, but during his time on the mountain, death was the last thing on his mind. He was determined to reach the top of the ice cap, and nothing else mattered. Krakauer included his travel writing to show that he and McCandless both have a resolute outlook on life. Both men know that they want to save their lives and they are willing to risk their lives to get