The large difference between Cullen and Hughes were their views on poetry, style, and equality. As previously stated, Cullen believed poetry was colorblind. He welcomed the techniques of previous poets, such as his inspirations John Keats and A.E. Housman. Hughes often wrote and encouraged other poets to “create a distinctive ‘Negro’ art, combating the ‘urge within the race toward whiteness’” (Hutchinson). It seemed as if Langston Hughes wanted equality, but wanted individuality as well. Black people were their own people, as well as valuable and human like every other white person. Now, Countee Cullen wanted equality but he did not approve poets being too racially driven. He did not think black writers should speak of so many unpleasant situations because they were not proud of them and it would start to create a rift concerning art between African Americans and white people (“Countee Cullen”). On the contrary, Cullen did write poems about racial injustice, but they were more of stories rather than call to actions like some of Hughes works. Cullen’s belief of colorblindness brought about his distaste for such racially centered poetry. He believed the style of poetry would cause more harm than good. Their differences set them apart, but Countee Cullen and Langston Hughes were still very influential to the black community during the Harlem