Lanterman Petris Short Act Analysis

Words: 482
Pages: 2

One of the acts that played into the history of prevention and crisis intervention is Short-Doyle Act, passed by the Legislature in 1957. It was, meant to provide funding and structure to improve care and encourage deinstitutionalization of patients from federally funded state mental hospitals (Kanel, 2006). In essence, this change was facilitated by the need for improved care in the community outside the hospital environmental, often referred to as deinstitutionalization. Essentially, an achievement by this act was the creation of a system of community-based mental health services to help those with mental problems.
By establishing more specific requirements for the provision of mental health services in the community, the Lanterman Petris Short Act, passed in 1968, transformed the role of prevention and crisis intervention in the United States. For instance, this act provided a basis for crisis intervention for patients who were not chronically mentally ill (Kanel, 2006). Lanterman Petris Short Act also provided a basis for prompt evaluation in addition to treatment of individuals with mental health disorders as well as those impaired by chronic alcoholism.
…show more content…
It can be completed within a relatively short period of time compared to other approaches, as well as it can be provided cross-culturally since it’s founded on universal laws and assumptions related to human behavior. For example, I can use it in a situation involving someone who thinks they are unworthy of respect of love by asking the person to prove that he/she is unlovable while prompting the same person to acknowledge the love and respect that his family have for him/her. This will go a long way in helping the person to challenges the thoughts of feeling socially