The question of whether it is better for a leader to be loved or feared is something that has been pondered for centuries. Lao-tzu proposed that it is better for a leader to be loved, whereas Machiavelli argued that it is better for a leader to be feared, as long as he is not hated. Throughout each of their writings, both have thoughts on war and military matters, human nature, and how they view a leader/think a leader should act, which are the bases of comparison between the two. Throughout their works, the writers are trying to convey reasons why their opinion about being loved or feared is correct. On the subject of war and the military, both Lao-tzu and Machiavelli have strong differences. Lao-tzu believes that "weapons are the tools…show more content… With Lao-tzu's understanding, to be a good leader you must "learn to follow the Tao," and of course encourage others to do so (verse 57, page 29). In doing so, "people would be content with their simple, everyday lives, in harmony, and free of desire" (verse 37, page 27). A leader must also try not to dominate or control the people. "The Master doesn't try to be powerful; thus he is truly powerful" says Lao-tzu (verse 38, page 28). By not trying to be powerful, a leader is perceived as loving. With less power is how Lao-tzu feels a leader should act, "For governing a country well, there is nothing better than moderation" (verse 59, page 30). Lao-tzu also feels that if a leader is not seen so much as a leader, he will be able to lead better. He states that "If you want to govern the people, you must place yourself below them" showing how he believes in a more loving approach (verse 66, page 32). Machiavelli disagrees with most everything Lao-tzu deems necessary to becoming a leader. He expects a leader to be powerful and involved. A leader must also not worry about being feared, but "should think about avoiding those things which make him hated and despised" (page 50). It is important that "Above all other things a prince must guard himself against being despised and hated" (page 45) for a prince who is despised cannot carry out his duties. While Lao-tzu believes a leader should respect his people and their property, Machiavelli feels that as a leader, "Spending the wealth of others does not lessen your reputation but adds to it; only the spending of your own is what harms you" (page 44). Machiavelli also knows that a prince keeping his word could be the downfall of his governing and states that "Princes who have accomplished great deeds are those who have cared little for keeping their promises and who have known how to manipulate the minds of men by
