Discuss the ethical implications for diverse populations. The IQ test resulted in students being wrongly placed in classes, facing discrimination, and being stigmatized, which ultimately led to legal challenges. These issues could have been mitigated if ethical guidelines had been established during that time. In the Larry P. vs. Riles case, the ethical considerations for diverse populations start with the expectation that psychologists should only form opinions about students' mental capacities after thoroughly examining everyone to substantiate their assessments (Standard 9.01 (b), American Psychological Association, 2017). According to Standard 9.08 (b), psychologists should avoid basing their decisions or recommendations on outdated and…show more content… v. Riles case. Additionally, the test results (test data) should have been communicated to the students and/or their parents (Standard 9.04) and the decision to place them into (E. M. R.) classes should have been clearly explained (Standard 9.10), as per the American Psychological Association, 2017. While not explicitly mentioned in the standards, another approach to fostering diversity is for schools to embrace and impart essential skills to students from varied backgrounds, enabling them to thrive in society. https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/495/926/2007878/ Furthermore, when analyzing the results of assessments, psychologists are expected to consider various influencing factors such as situational, personal, and cultural differences that might impact their judgment, which relates to avoiding unfair discrimination (Standard 9.06, (APA, 2017). Ethical codes are intended as standards for professionals to follow when providing the best care to their clients. The intelligence testing outcomes from the schools perpetuated segregation within the California public education system, hindering African American students from accessing educational…show more content… This adjustment ensures that IQ tests are not the sole basis for placing African American students in specific educational categories. Additionally, Standard 3.01 on Unfair Discrimination stipulates that psychologists should not engage in discrimination based on factors such as age, gender, gender identity, race, ethnicity, culture, national origin, disability, or socioeconomic status, as discussed by Miller, L. & Lovler, R. (2020).The discriminatory practices observed in the California school could have been prevented if the psychologist responsible for administering the test had properly interpreted the scores and made informed recommendations for student placement. Conclusion Psychological evaluations have existed for a long time, and certain assessments have historically been criticized for being
