Law: Corporation and Salomon Essay

Submitted By Bowen01
Words: 3053
Pages: 13
Open Document
Rationale and Impact of the Salomon Principle

I. Introduction

As a landmark case in UK company law, the judgments to the Salomon case1 gives effects on upholding the principle of corporate personality. As a result, company’s shareholders would not be liable for the debts of an insolvent company. Seeing the decision in Salomon v Salomon Ltd, a company is formed if it has separated legal personality and limited liability. Furthermore, shareholders, directors are divorced with the company itself. They are independent entity under the law.

II. The ‘Salomon’ principle

In this case, Mr Aron Salomon was a merchant manufacturing leather boots and shoes. He ran his own business as a sole trader. By the year his sons preferred to be his partners, Salomon decided to incorporate his business as a Limited company, Salomon & Co Ltd. Complied with the Companies Act 1862 (whose descendant is the Companies Act 2006) s62 which provided that seven or more persons together could incorporate a business, Mrs Salomon and their five children became subscribers. Mr Salomon himself was managing director. The business was valued £39,000 when purchased by the company. Mr Salomon owned 20,001 of the company’s 20,007 shares. Each of his family members allotted 1 share in the company. Salomon received the value of £10,000 in the form of secured debentures. These debentures were secured by means of a floating charge over the assets of a company. The remainder £9,000 was paid by cash. In this way he became both the company’s principal shareholder and its principle creditor at the same time. Coping with stress of fund shortage, Salomon transferred half of the debentures to Broderip for £5,000 and entered his name.

The company met faults finally because of the strikes, failing to meet the interest payments on debentures. The debentures held by Broderip could not be paid off at that time. As the requirement of unpaid trade creditors, the company went into liquidation. The assets were sold off so that sufficient funds could be used to pay the debt. However, the secured debentures ranked in priority to the trade creditors. As a result, £5,000 was repaid to Broderip. There was still a remaining asset of £1,055 available. Mr Salomon then claimed the funds to cover his retained debentures and thus other unsecured creditors got nothing paid. The liquidator argued Salomon was liable for the company’s debt. He believed the company was an agent of Salomon in this way.

In the first instance court, the case Broderip v Salomon [1985] 2 Ch 323 was judged that Mr Broderip’s claim to be paid off by the company was valid, for the loan was secured and in priority to unsecured trade creditors. Nevertheless, the liquidator counter-claimed Salomon was responsible for the unsecured debentures personally. The judge, Vaughan Williams J accepted this argument. He held that since the company was transferred solely with spurious reasons. He said that the company was just a nominee, an agent of Mr Salomon in reality. Therefore, Salomon should pay the unsecured debentures personally.

The court of Appeal upheld the decision of Vaughan Williams J against Salomon. However, the reasons were not the same with High Court completely. The judge recognized that the business formed to a legal entity validly in complying with the 1862 Act s6 s83, but the court would not agree that the debts should be separated with its founders, Salomon. The court believed that Salomon incorporated the company with a hidden purpose. This was a ruse of running the business as before with a limited liability. Lindley LJ held that there was a trust relationship between the company and Salomon, and thus Salomon was bound to cover the debts.

The House of Lords denied the judgment in reserving the decision of the Court of Appeal. They rejected the arguments from agency and fraud. The House held that the incorporation followed the Companies Acts 1986 and there was a fact that once the business was
Show More

Related Documents: Law: Corporation and Salomon Essay

Corp La Essay

------------------------------------------------- Assignment ------------------------------------------------- Corpations Law Summer School Michelle Pollacco s3842889 Abstract Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] AC 22 is significant because it was not until the House of Lords handed down its decision that the de facto one person company was fully recognized as being a separate entity. The Corporations Act allows the formation of public or proprietary companies with a singe shareholder s114. The principal…

Words 3004 - Pages 13

Essay about Busniess Law

company is a dominant type of business organization in he market economy and at law. Someone thinks it has no personality, while someone supports it is a reality with its own status in law. This essay will introduce the some points about the relationship between promoters and company, the promoters motive in setting up a company absolutely irrelevant in determine corporate liability, analyze the case of Salomon v. Salomon and if the members are liable the company’s liabilities. All of these, this essay…

Words 1698 - Pages 7

Salomon vs Salomon Essay

being a legal entity independent of its members, can enter into contracts and own property in its own right, can sue and be sued and also taxed in its own name. The principle of corporate entity was established in the case of Salomon v A. Salomon , now referred to as the ‘Salomon’ principle. The facts of this case were that the owner of a business sold it to a company he had formed, in return for fully paid-up shares to himself and members of his family, and secured debentures. When the company went…

Words 1530 - Pages 7

Corporate Capacity Essay

Corporate Law Lecture 3 Lecturer/stream details Legal nature of companies ► The separate entity doctrine ► Corporate capacity ► Limited liability ► Piercing the corporate veil ► Corporate liability Separate legal entity doctrine ► The company is a legal person separate from its participants ► This means that:  its obligations and property are its own and not those of its participants  its existence continues unchanged even if the identity of the participants changes Salomon v Salomon (1897)…

Words 682 - Pages 3

CH 15 Essay

Study Guide to accompany Canadian Business and the Law, 5th edition Chapter 15 CHAPTER 15 THE CORPORATE FORM: ORGANIZATIONAL MATTERS Objectives After studying this chapter, you should have an understanding of • a corporation as a legal person • the distinction between federal and provincial incorporation • the share structure of a corporation • the selection of a corporation’s name • how a corporation is created • how the corporation is financed • how securities are regulated Learning Outcomes…

Words 4206 - Pages 17

Walter Jones Case

Part A: 1. Agency The relationship of agency is usually carried out of a contract. The basis of legality of relationship of agency is usually subject to the common law of con-tract. It can also be implied as where one person(agent) agrees to provide ser-vices or enters into a contract with other person(principle) for the fulfilment of a specified task. This relationship can either be expressed orally or in writing gen-erally giving details of its duration, financial aspects and scope of…

Words 1628 - Pages 7

Essay about SOME REFLECTIONS ON COMPANY LAW REFORM

MODERN LAW REVIEW 54 April, 1944 his attention from abstract jurisprudence and from such concrete studies as Anglo-Saxon land tenure or the manumission of slaves in the reign of Hadrian, and to concentrate upon a subject which really matters the huge resources of industry and learning which have already been lavished so unsparingly upon subjects which do not. C . P. HARVEY. SOME REFLECTIONS ON COMPANY LAW REFORM A DISCUSSION of the problems connected with the reform of company…

Words 2446 - Pages 10

Concept of Separate Legal Entity and Consequences of Corporate Personality on a Company Essay

SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT ACW 204 COMPANY LAW AND SECRETARIAL PRACTICES YEAR 2010/2011 SEMESTER 1 Lecturer : Dr. Hazril Izwar Ibrahim Name : Kok Cheng Hon Matric No. : 105000 COMPANY LAW AND SECRETARIAL PRACTICES- ACW 203/204 INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT Discuss the concept of separate legal entity and consequences of corporate personality on a company; as part of the discussion present your opinion whether the judiciary can ignore the rule of separate corporate personality and how the said rule…

Words 2747 - Pages 11

Corporation Law Essay

Corporations Law Tutorial Questions Week 2 – T2 2012 1. What is the difference between incorporated entities and unincorporated entities? (p51 of textbook) Unincorporated associations are clubs and societies which are formed to carry on various activities but where the members do not aim to make a profit and distribute it to themselves. Unincorporated associations are not a separate legal entity. This means that it can not hold property in its own name ( property must be held in the names…

Words 610 - Pages 3

Essay on Law Assign Final

ISSUE: Are Tony and Ulysses entitled to receive more profit share than mentioned in the deed? Are partners bound to pay liquor supplier $5000 that is more than the stipulated limit to be approved by any individual partner, as per the agreement? LAW: Section 1 of the Partnership Act 1892 (NSW), provides that three elements must be satisfied in order to establish the existence of a partnership. These elements are:  The carrying on of a business;  In common;  With a view to profit. The existence…

Words 1568 - Pages 7