Liebeck Vs Mcdonald's Case Analysis

Words: 624
Pages: 3
Open Document
When the media and general public talk about torts, they think of aggressive and bad customers suing big companies for their own mistakes and little problems to gain easy and big money. I also thought it that way. When I heard “A woman sued McDonald’s for spilling hot coffee on herself”, I thought “Well, I should sue Starbucks for serving that hot Americano!”. But turns out, Liebeck v. McDonald’s case was much more than that.
I agree with the general contention in the Hot Coffee movie. I definitely believe that the civil justice system in this country is under attack. While I would like to believe that our justice system is clean and give fair chance to receive justice for citizens, I believe that many big companies from different categories
Show More

Related Documents: Liebeck Vs Mcdonald's Case Analysis

Pearson and Mcdonal Lawsuit Analysis Essay

Pearson and McDonald’s Lawsuit Analysis Samantha Penico University of Maryland University College, AMBA 610 Executive Summary There are two major lawsuits which the main populace has defined as frivolous. One of those cases is the McDonald’s split coffee case. This is the case where the plaintiff spilled her coffee and was rumored to sue McDonald’s for 2.7 million dollars and win. The other’s case is the Pearson dry cleaning case where a man sued Chung Dry Cleaner’s 54 million dollars for…

Words 3462 - Pages 14