First, Limbaugh said in paragraph 1 “Feminism was established so that unattractive women could have easier access to the mainstream of society.” Readers are wondering and are left hanging about what criteria defines women unattractive and what access to the mainstream of society Limbaugh talked about.
Second, Limbaugh mentioned about “truth” without clearly define “truth” and gave no concrete proofs to back it up. Limbaugh also claimed in paragraph 3 “feminist leadership is basically …show more content…
What did men do to cross the line when they made the advances toward women? What concrete proofs to back up the notion men will become fearful about making any advances? Again, no concrete proofs given by Limbaugh to back up the statement “men will become fearful about making any advances.”
Fifth, “The fact of the matter is that women have more power than most of them realize.” in paragraph 9 is a serious fallacy. We are left confused and unclear when Limbaugh defined “the fact of the matter” without giving any concrete proofs.
Finally, name calling in the statement “Some militant feminists apparently harbor such animosity for the opposite sex that they want to criminalize the process of courtship” in paragraph 11 is the desperate attempt by Limbaugh to show something without giving any concrete proofs to back it up. Why did Limbaugh call feminist civil rights leaders militant? Did he have a personal vendetta against them? Was he full of hatred toward the feminist civil rights leaders?
In conclusion, The Latest from the Feminist “Front” is a flawed essay and has many fallacies because the author Rush Limbaugh clearly has many misconceptions and misbelieves, and the essay offers no concrete proofs and merits to back up Limbaugh’s