Though it's debatable, Lincoln's reputation as "The Great Emancipator" may not be accurate given an in-depth investigation of his actions. Despite making significant strides toward freedom, Lincoln's actions only partially justified being dubbed "The Great Emancipator." Even though he has come a long way since then, he doesn't fully deserve the title. Lincoln's efforts to end slavery, such as the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863, make him partially deserving of the label "The Great Emancipator." Lincoln's deeds only partially won him the label of The Great Emancipator, even though he made substantial progress in achieving emancipation. To demonstrate that Lincoln somewhat merits his title, I will present several arguments in this essay. First, during the Civil War, a major conflict erupted…show more content… The reason he was dubbed "The Great Emancipator" was because of his commitment to upholding the Union at a time when slavery had to eventually cease. In conclusion, because he battled society for what was right and abolished slavery, Abraham Lincoln richly merits being known as "The Great Emancipator." With the help of this data, it is evident that Lincoln is deserving of this title since, in addition to ending slavery, he also spent a great deal of time protecting the Union. He put in a lot of effort and endured hardships to earn this honor. Some, on the other hand, would argue that Lincoln fully deserves the label of "The Great Emancipation," considering that he mostly fulfilled the conditions before the Emancipation Proclamation was passed. In the heat of the moment, it was difficult to completely comprehend the significance of President Lincoln's proclamation when it was announced, according to Cooper Institute New York, February 6, 1863. But it matters a lot. Slavery has been encouraged by the government for more than 60 years. We have been ruled by slavery as a strong force. Cotton was the king; it was not simply a
