To accomplish his needs, Lincoln subverted the constitution, started a disturbing Civil War, and trampled the rights of the state whose effects are still felt up to now. About 600,000 …show more content…
The information is primary since his perspective is new in the history that adds to the resources that help in opening up more facts about the American leaders and their influence. The books are arranged in contextual and argumentative main body so as to make his concept be understood by readers. There are pictures used that serve as an account for the details that are explained in the texts. The charts and graphs compare the impact that is a result of the Lincoln’s leadership as compared to the other presidents on economic and demographic issues. The footnotes in the text are awash of the primary sources of bonus quotes. These are used in the editions which have been printed recently that try to vanquish challenges from the …show more content…
Though the American method is not friendly, it does not resemble Federal Reserve System of the international bankers. Economist Thomas J. DiLorenzo in his book tries to convince people that it was the responsibility of Lincoln to nationalize the railroads. The fact is that all the political parties assented to the transcontinental railroads during the 1860 platforms of the political parties. The idea was popular with all the people during the time that it was a concerted effort but not own plan as it was put by the author. DiLorenzo in his attempt to make people believe that Lincoln was evil in suspending the habeas corpus in the times of war is misleading. Jefferson Davis got the pass in his act of suspending the habeas corpus in the south.
Nevertheless, DiLorenzo wants historians to believe that Lincoln was responsible for the reconstruction before his untimely death yet the president banned the underlying Wade-Davis bill aimed at rebuilding the Republican before he was killed. The reason that was given by Lincoln for his rejection of the legislation is that the idea was too radical and should not be adopted. Due to this, Lincoln was despised since it was against the will of the citizens who believed that the reconstruction was going to improve the