Totschlag-Argument is a common figure of speech for the German past. In this context it is referring to the conscripted end-all that comes when bringing up the Holocaust that many Germans associate with. Totschlag-Argument poses a threat for modern Germans to become guilty again, as if they are no different from the Germans who committed the Holocaust 72 years ago (similar to the Goldhagen debate). Dr. Lisa Kreig, cultural, social anthropologist, focuses on how the topic of the Holocaust in contemporary Germany is conceived as an almost human-like entity, that conspires feelings of guilt, controls political discussions, and dictates discussions. This “narrative of agency” is perceived and imagined as a threat in many Germans lives and a way to indoctrinate feelings of guilt and continual reminding of the past. Through research conducted on young Germans, under 30, in Cologne, Germany, Dr. Krieg argues that the Holocaust in many German citizens is created into this humanly; agency power that creates emotionally charged discourse with the memory of the National Socialist past (13). Many of the Germans interviewed felt that once the Holocaust is brought up in discussion, it’s a lose-lose for them. Farther in the interview the Krieg points out how one women interviewed referred to the Holocausts as “es” or it. Another interviewer described the Holocaust as a weapon that someone can use intentionally, backing Germans into right-wing associated corners . Many scholars refer to the attributing special powers to the Holocaust impact on German people. Olick and Levy (1997: 922) pointed out that the Holocaust constrains German political culture as an almost mythical taboo, though it is often unclear what exactly the threat is that is associated with the Holocaust and the Nazi-Keule or Nazi-Cruse. However, by turning the Holocaust into such a powerful entity,