In 1997, Congress asked the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD, 2000) to select an independent panel of reviewers to evaluate research and literature in order to determine the most effective way to teach children how to read. This panel was comprised of fourteen individuals from a variety of backgrounds; scientists in reading research, representatives of colleges of education, reading teachers, educational administrators, and parents. The panel came to be known as the National Reading Panel (NRP). The result of the NRP research was that the most effective way to teach children to read is through diverse instructional methods and techniques. According to the panel, effective reading instruction should consist of teaching students to break apart words and listen for sounds (phonemic awareness), teaching students that sounds form words (phonics), having students read aloud and provide them with feedback (guided oral reading), and applying comprehension strategies to guide and build complete reading comprehension. With this new wealth of knowledge, the NICHD began distributing their findings to law makers, educators, and parents in an effort to increase reading skills in America’s children (National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 2000).
The National Reading Panel (NICHD, 2000) found that almost 44% of fourth graders did not read with grade level appropriate accuracy or speed. The NRP concluded that these deficits are likely the cause of students’ decreased reading comprehension. As a result of these findings, the NRP recommended that fluency instruction become a fixture in all reading curricula. Along with these findings, the NRP also identified fluency, reading with accuracy, speed, and appropriate expression, to be the step preceding reading comprehension.
In the area of vocabulary acquisition, Coyne, Simmons, Kame’enui, and Stoolmiller (2004) conducted an experimental study with 34 kindergarten students. The treatment group received lucid vocabulary instruction through an intervention program. The results showed that the treatment group had greater gains in vocabulary acquisition than the control group. Based on these results, Coyne, Simmons, Kame’enui, and Stoolmiller (2004) concluded, “Explicitly teaching word meanings within the context of shared storybook reading is an effective method for increasing the vocabulary of young children at risk of experiencing reading difficulties” (p.152). This precise instruction makes students more aware of words and increases the likeliness of them learning and using new words independently.
One strategy used to build fluency and comprehension is repeated or redundant readings. Rasinski (2003) stated that extensive research exists on the value and benefits of repeated readings. He held that two such benefits of repeated readings of short stories are quick and accurate processing of text: This leads to more meaningful reading over time. Samuels (1979) stated, “As less attention is required for decoding, more attention becomes available for comprehension. Thus rereading both builds fluency and enhances comprehension” (p.378). Students are not trying to split their time between decoding and comprehension. They can simply focus on the meaning of text and gain a deeper understanding of the material at hand.
Studies frequently link poor