Lizzie Borden Research Paper

Words: 2282
Pages: 10

The Prosecution After the murders were committed, Lizzie Borden was questioned by the police about the events that took place prior. Lizzie’s responses to the police were deemed to be “inconsistent” and she was “rambling.” Many of her answers were confusing and did not make sense with the crime. At the time that the murders took place, Lizzie had multiple different stories about where she was. She told police she was out in the yard, retrieving fishing gear from the barn, and that she was out picking pears. Police arrested Lizzie for the murders due to her inconsistent answers. According to the media, it is difficult to determine whether Lizzie’s arrest was justified, however, police believe that her inconsistent and confusing answers were …show more content…
It was inferred that Lizzie was trying to buy the drug to poison her parents. The prosecution used this information to explain that Lizzie most likely turned to axing her parents after she was unsuccessful in buying the poison. Another witness was Alice Russell, who was a neighbor of the Bordens. She told police that Lizzie had explained how she was scared that someone was going to try to kill her father. She believed it to be an enemy of Andrew Borden. One piece of evidence that was unusual in the proceedings was the presentation of axes that were found in the Borden home. However, none of those axes matched up with the axe that was used during the murders. Police thoroughly searched the Borden home and the areas surrounding it but were never able to find another weapon. This could make it difficult to directly link Lizzie to the murders. The Defense The defense lawyers involved in the Lizzie Borden case were Andrew Jennings and George D. Robinson. Robinson was a very public figure in this case because he was the former Governor of Massachusetts. Both men believed that Lizzie was innocent, and that the prosecution did not have enough evidence to convict Lizzie of these