Response to Column (must be at least 200 words): In response to Charles M. Blow’s disagreement and analysis of Trump’s “Lost Cause Mythology,” Blow masterfully crafts comprehensive and superlative …show more content…
Blow underscores how Trump’s rhetoric fits into the Confederate Lost Cause mythology pattern, creating a wider context of the Civil War by drawing parallels. Continuing, Blow effectively highlights the surreptitious nature of revisiting narratives in eroding the truth and spreading and promoting an ideology of political falsehood. Moreover, Blow’s identification of Trump’s personal and pathetic knock version of the Lost Cause, which is rooted in grievances and a refusal to accept defeat, sheds light on the manipulative tactics employed to rewrite history and demolish the already forged path of political justice that has led to a country of injustice, consternation, and tyranny. The column is undoubtedly a powerful and poignant illustration of the need to confront and challenge revisionist historical narratives to preserve justice, safety, and truth. Blow’s analysis enables readers to be alerted and to remain vigilant to contempt such records, stories, ideas, etc. In conclusion, through the intervention of Blow’s cues, readers should be encouraged to recognize the danger posed by former President Donald J. Trump’s rhetoric, but also account for proactive steps that could be …show more content…
Blow develops historical analogies and extensive analysis to expose the proposed dangers that are present in Trymp’s “Lost Cause” mythology. Trump’s theory is used by Blow in comparison to their Lost Cause theory, which was constructed after the Civil War era, pointing out similarities in the way people distort the truth to achieve their political purposes and notions. Additionally, Blow also mocks and criticizes Trump’s petty version of the Lost Cause, which focuses on personal grudges and refuses to concede historical defeat. Blow adds to his position by stating, “Trump has his version of the Lost Cause, one that’s not completely untethered from the old one, but one that’s miniaturized, personal, and petty.” Through masterful use of allusions to historical analogies, as well as providing a bigoted analysis, Blow outlines and exemplifies the risk implied in Trump’s actions and motives, and the detrimental effect that it could potentially have on the truth, justice, and democracy of the United States of America. The historical analogy strengthens the persuasiveness of the argument through several tactics and methods, some of which are contextualized. Continuing, this allows Blow to contextualize